This one’s for Ray.
He’s a dear friend who keeps pestering — uh, I mean encouraging — me to explore boxed wines.
So, Ray, here are some recent observations of boxed wines.
They are courtesy of Karen Page and Andrew Dornenburg at The Washington Post:
It’s tough enough to convince wine lovers that screw-cap closures are better than the traditional corks; unscrewing a bottle doesn’t inspire the same poetry as popping a cork. But convincing them that boxed wines are not inferior is even tougher, which might account for the lack of coverage.
However, because boxed wines are one of the fastest-growing segments of the wine market (up more than 40 percent over a year ago, according to the Nielsen Co.), that should change.
How good can a boxed wine be? Sipped at a party in 2005, a 2004 Dtour Macon ($37 for a three-liter cylinder, equal to about $9.25 a bottle) left Page and Dornenburg “shocked by the quality that came out of this cardboard tube and the vacuum-sealed bag.”
Given the economic times, Ray may be on to something.
I did a quick survey on the Wine News Review aptly named Smarter Wine Search tool and came up with a couple helpful recent articles that include boxed-wine recommendation among a slew of other affordable picks:
- CBSNews.com opines, “This just might be box-wines’ greatest hour!” The article serves up two three-liter selections: one from California (Black Box Chardonnay 2006, $28) and the other from Australia (Hardy’s Cabernet Sauvignon 2006, $24).
- The San Jose Mercury News suggests the non-vintage Corbett Canyon Chardonnay, about $10 for three liters, translating to about $2.50 for a 750-milliliter bottle.
Thanks for the idea, Ray!























Comments 5
Thanks for the Box-Wine ideas, Sam! I’ll keep an eye out for that Hardy’s cabernet.
I used the Smarter Wine Search last week to find a Malbec, and it turned up a gem: It was Gascon, and for $12.99, it was superb. Thanks.
Keep up the good work!
Your pal,
Ray
Posted 10 May 2008 at 5:00 pm ¶I’m a way big fan of Malbecs (as alert WNR readers know). Thanks for pointing out this one, Ray. Glad the Smarter Wine Search helped out!
Posted 11 May 2008 at 8:26 pm ¶Alas. So many wines. So little time……
Posted 14 May 2008 at 8:04 pm ¶Indeed!
Posted 15 May 2008 at 6:08 pm ¶I’m all for boxing wines. As far as I’m concerned it’s a win, win ,win situation.
It takes me several days to consume a bottle of red wine and most deteriorate quite rapidly. We use one of those vacuum pumps but that’s a pain and although it’s not perfect it will extend the life somewhat.
Please producers put some, no all, of your wines in boxes.
In addition, I can’t believe the shippers and distributors don’t love box wines. The shape and weight savings must yield significant cost reductions.
so…
” ban the bottle”
“cork the cork”
and if you absolutely need to seal a bottle —
Posted 15 Dec 2008 at 3:45 pm ¶— screw it!!!
Post a Comment