Follow on Twitter

These tough economic times may just be the ‘greatest hour’ for boxed wines

Click photo for larger image

Wine Photo of The Day by PhillipC — Click photo for larger image

Wine Photo of the Day by PhillipC

This one’s for Ray.

He’s a dear friend who keeps pestering — uh, I mean encouraging — me to explore boxed wines.

So, Ray, here are some recent observations of boxed wines.

They are courtesy of Karen Page and Andrew Dornenburg at The Washington Post:

It’s tough enough to convince wine lovers that screw-cap closures are better than the traditional corks; unscrewing a bottle doesn’t inspire the same poetry as popping a cork. But convincing them that boxed wines are not inferior is even tougher, which might account for the lack of coverage.

However, because boxed wines are one of the fastest-growing segments of the wine market (up more than 40 percent over a year ago, according to the Nielsen Co.), that should change.

How good can a boxed wine be? Sipped at a party in 2005, a 2004 Dtour Macon ($37 for a three-liter cylinder, equal to about $9.25 a bottle) left Page and Dornenburg  “shocked by the quality that came out of this cardboard tube and the vacuum-sealed bag.”

Given the economic times, Ray may be on to something.

I did a quick survey on the Wine News Review aptly named Smarter Wine Search tool and came up with a couple helpful recent articles that include boxed-wine recommendation among a slew of other affordable picks:

  • CBSNews.com opines, “This just might be box-wines’ greatest hour!” The article serves up two three-liter selections: one from California (Black Box Chardonnay 2006, $28) and the other from Australia (Hardy’s Cabernet Sauvignon 2006, $24).
  • The San Jose Mercury News suggests the non-vintage Corbett Canyon Chardonnay, about $10 for three liters, translating to about $2.50 for a 750-milliliter bottle.

Thanks for the idea, Ray!

vtk

 

 

Related stories you might like:



If you liked this article, consider subscribing by RSS/e-mail. Help spread the news — and add some popularity to Wine News Review — with the buttons below to e-mail this story to a friend or post it to sites like del.icio.us, Digg, StumbleUpon and Technorati.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • Fark
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MisterWong
  • Netvouz
  • Propeller
  • TailRank
  • YahooMyWeb
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Comments 5

  1. Ray wrote:

    Thanks for the Box-Wine ideas, Sam! I’ll keep an eye out for that Hardy’s cabernet.

    I used the Smarter Wine Search last week to find a Malbec, and it turned up a gem: It was Gascon, and for $12.99, it was superb. Thanks.

    Keep up the good work!

    Your pal,

    Ray

    Posted 10 May 2008 at 5:00 pm
  2. vinothekid wrote:

    I’m a way big fan of Malbecs (as alert WNR readers know). Thanks for pointing out this one, Ray. Glad the Smarter Wine Search helped out!

    Posted 11 May 2008 at 8:26 pm
  3. Ray wrote:

    Alas. So many wines. So little time……

    Posted 14 May 2008 at 8:04 pm
  4. vinothekid wrote:

    Indeed!

    Posted 15 May 2008 at 6:08 pm
  5. Russ wrote:

    I’m all for boxing wines. As far as I’m concerned it’s a win, win ,win situation.
    It takes me several days to consume a bottle of red wine and most deteriorate quite rapidly. We use one of those vacuum pumps but that’s a pain and although it’s not perfect it will extend the life somewhat.
    Please producers put some, no all, of your wines in boxes.

    In addition, I can’t believe the shippers and distributors don’t love box wines. The shape and weight savings must yield significant cost reductions.

    so…
    ” ban the bottle”
    “cork the cork”

    and if you absolutely need to seal a bottle —
    — screw it!!!

    Posted 15 Dec 2008 at 3:45 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *